Biographical Note-Roscoe Pound

Roscoe Pound, (born October 27, 1870, Lincoln, Nebraska, U.S.— died July 1, 1964, Cambridge, Massachusetts), American legal adviser, botanist, and educator, chief advocate of “Sociological Jurisprudence” and an innovator in the change of court administration in the United States. [1]

Pound filled in as commissioner of appeals for the state supreme court (1901–03) and commissioner on uniform state laws for Nebraska (1904–07). He taught at North-western University in Evanston, Illinois (1907–09), and at the University of Chicago (1909–10), after which he went to Harvard, where he was professor of law (1910–37) and dean of law school(1916–36). After World War II he invested some energy in China revamping the Nationalist Chinese legal framework.[2]

Pound’s five-volume Jurisprudence is among the most complete of twentieth-century lawful works. His hypothesis of sociological jurisprudence/law necessitated that acquired legitimate codes and conventions be changed in accordance with reflect contemporary social conditions. The hypothesis may have somewhat enlivened—and was progressed by others as an avocation of—the New Deal enactment of President Franklin D. Roosevelt during the 1930s, which Pound nonetheless considered extreme.[3]

Introduction:

The connection between the individual, society, and the State has been changing and different hypotheses with respect to them have been propounded every now and then. To start with, society was represented by customs which had just social approval. At that point came the reign of the ministers. From that point forward, the mainstream state rose and ruled all the organizations. As a response, the significance of individual was attested by philosophers and scholars. The equilibrium between the welfare of the society and that of the individual was hard found through various uprisings and political coups.

Society and human life are intertwined. From adolescence to old age, each individual expects that their longing is to be satisfied for which their emerge strife of wants or claims which goes under the expression “interest”. It is difficult to satisfy all the wants of an individual. So, to satisfy the wants of most persons for the prosperity & welfare of society the idea of Social Engineering rose and which was instituted by Roscoe Pound. Social engineering depends on the hypothesis that laws are made to shape the general public and manage the individuals’ conduct. It is an endeavor to control human behavior through the assistance of Law.

According to Pound, “Law is social engineering which means a balance between the competing interests in society,” in which applied science is used for resolving individual and social problems.[4]

To keep up the lawful structure and its appropriate working, certain interests should be viewed as like individual interests, public and social interests, a meaning of cut-off points inside which such interests will be perceived and offered impact to, and then making sure about of those interests inside the cut-off points as characterized.

While deciding the scope  and subject matter of the system, the accompanying things must be dealt with:

1. Readiness of a stock of interests, characterizing them,
2. Choice of the interests which ought to be lawfully perceived,
3. Boundary of the constraints of making sure about the interests so chose,
4. Thought of the methods whereby laws may make sure to safeguard the interests when those have been recognized and delimited, and
5. Advancement of the standards of valuation of interests.

Theory of Social Engineering

Pound contrasted the assignment of the attorney with the engineers. He expressed that the point of social engineering is to manufacture a structure of society, as conceivable, which requires the satisfaction or fulfillment of maximum needs with the least use of assets. It includes the adjusting of contending interests. He called this hypothesis the hypothesis of “Social Engineering.”

Here Pound has utilized two words for example “Social” which means the gathering of individuals shaping a general public. The subsequent word is “Engineering” which means applied science did by specialists to deliver completed items, in light of persistent experimentation and experience to get the completed item by methods for an instrument or gadget.

For encouraging the assignments of social engineering, Pound grouped different interests to be ensured by law in three heads:

• Private/Individual Interests
• Public Interests
• Social Interests

1. Private Interests/Individual Interest: Individual interests, as per Pound are claims, or requests, or wants from the purpose of the person. Singular interests as per Pound incorporates:
   1. Homegrown/Domestic Relations: It is critical to recognize the enthusiasm of people in homegrown connections and that of society in such establishments as family and marriage. Singular interests incorporate those of:
      • Guardians and Children,
      • Married couples and
      • Conjugal interests.
   2. Self-ness/Personality
      • The physical individual,
      • Opportunity of will,
      • Honor and notoriety,
      • Protection and sensibilities, and
      • Conviction and conclusion.
   3. Interest of substance: This incorporates:
      • Opportunity of industry and agreement,
      • Guaranteed focal points,
      • Invaluable relations with others,
      • Opportunity of affiliation,
      • Progression of business, and
      • Interests of property.
2. Public Interest: Public interests as indicated by him are the cases or requests or wants to take a gander at from the point of view life in a politically sorted out society. The fundamental public interests as indicated by Roscoe pound are:
   1. Interests of state as a juristic individual which incorporates
      • Interests of state as a juristic individual for example security
      • Cases of the politically sorted out society as an enterprise to property gained and held for corporate purposes.
   2. Interests of State as a gatekeeper of social intrigue, specifically administration and organization of trusts, altruistic enrichments, assurance of regular habitat, regional waters, coastlines, guideline of public business, etc to utilize thing which are available to public use, this interest appear to overlap with social premiums.
3. Social Interest: Social interests are the case or requests or wants thought of as far as public activity and summed up as cases of social groups. Social interests are said to incorporate:
   1. Social enthusiasm for the safeguard of social organizations: Social enthusiasm for the security of the social establishments incorporates:
      • General security of homegrown organizations,
      • Strict organizations, political establishment, and
      • Financial establishments.
   2. Social interest in general ethics – Social enthusiasm/interest in general ethics contains anticipation and preclusion of prostitution, inebriation, betting, and so forth.
   3. Social interest for general security: Social enthusiasm/interest for the overall security grasps those parts of the law which identity with:
      • General security,
      • General wellbeing,
      • Harmony and request,
      • Security of acquisitions, and
      • Security of exchanges.
   4. Social enthusiasm/interest for the preservation of social assets: Social interests in the protection of social assets covers protection of social assets and security and preparing of wards and defectives, for example, preservation of HR, defensive and training of wards and defectives, reorganization of deadbeats, security of monetary wards.
   5. Social enthusiasm/interest for general advancement: Social enthusiasm for general advancement has three perspectives. Monetary advancement, political advancement, and social advancement.
      • Political advancement covers free discourse and free affiliation, free supposition, free reactions.
      • Financial advancement covers the opportunity of utilization and offer of appropriately, free, exchange, free industry, and support of creations by the award of licenses.
      • Social(cultural) advancement covers free science, free letters, supportive gestures of expressions and letters, consolations of advanced education a learning and style.
   6. Social enthusiasm for singular life- Meaning subsequently every individual have the option to carry on with a human life as indicated by the person’s: [5]
      • Political life,
      • Social, and
      • Monetary life.

Jural Postulates of Roscoe Pound

So as to assess the clashing interests in due request of need, pound proposed that each general public society has certain fundamental postulates whereupon its ordering rests, through for more often than not they might be understood as opposed to explicitly defined. This supposition might be called jural hypothesizes of the overall set of laws of that society.

Pound has referenced five jural hypothesizes as follows:

1. Jural hypothesize I: In a civil society men must have the option to accept that others will submit no deliberate hostility upon them.
2. Jural hypothesize II: In a civil society, men must have the option to expect that they may control for beneficial purposes what they have found and appropriated to their own utilization, what they have made by their own work and what they have made by their own work and what they have obtained under the current social and financial request.
3. Jural hypothesize III: In a civil society man must have the option to expect that those with whom they bargain as an individual from the general public will act in accordance with some basic honesty and consequently:
   • Will make great sensible desires which their guarantees or other direct sensibly make.
   • Will do their endeavor as per the desires which the ethical slant of the network connects thereto.
   • Will re-establish explicitly or by identical what comes to them accidentally, or disappointment of the pre-speculations of an exchange, or other unexpected circumstances whereby they get to other’s detriment what they couldn’t sensibly have expected to get under the genuine conditions.
4. Jural propose IV: In an edified society men must have the option to accept that the individuals who take part in some course of action will act with due consideration not to project a nonsensical danger of injury upon others.
5. Jural hypothesize V: In an edified society men must have the option to accept that other people who keep up things or utilize offices, innocuous in the circle of their utilization yet destructive in their ordinary activity somewhere else, and having a characteristic inclination to cross the limits of their legitimate use will control them and keep them inside their appropriate limits.

Pound admitted that these jural hypothesizes are not supreme but rather they have relative worth. These are ideal guidelines which law should seek after in the public eye; they are of a changing sort and new hypothesizes may develop if the adjustments in the public eye so required. In this way, the jural hypothesizes by Roscoe pound give rules to enlightened life and they likewise try to find some kind of harmony among the real world and optimism as additional force and social responsibility of men in the network.

Applications of Theory of Social Engineering

Pounds hypothesis requests the greatest increase with least grating and waste for example most fulfillment of human needs or desires with least penance[6]. Here Pound needs to acquire social control in the society. Pound says that for social control, interest is the main thing which ought to be considered and Law is a way for social control. Accordingly, law should work for maintaining an equilibrium of interest inside the general public for example fulfilling most interest with least waste.

The facts demonstrate that lawfulness assumes a significant function in a general public. Law and order are completed by the Judiciary and they continue fitting the clashing interests of the individual and people in general through the cycle of social engineering.

1. It has been seen through the activity of the Supreme Court in Vellore Citizen’s Welfare Forum Vs. The Union of India[7] wherein Kuldip Singh J. conveyed the judgment that regardless of whether the enterprises are of crucial significance for the nation’s progress as they give, work yet having respect to the contamination brought about by him, the guideline of sustainable development must be embraced as an adjusting idea among environment and advancement[8] . For this situation the two standards rose, for example, the precautionary principle and the Polluter Pays rule.
2. In a landmark instance of Union Carbide Corporation v. Association of India[9] , the Supreme Court set out the standard of Absolute Liability in which it was held that where an undertaking is occupied with a risky or intrinsically perilous action and damage results to anybody because of a mishap in the activity of such unsafe action, at that point the venture included is carefully and totally subject to remunerate to each one of the individuals who are influenced by the mishap[10] . For this situation with respect to the remuneration, the Court said that the proportion of pay must be connected to the size and limit of the venture in light of the fact that such payment has an impediment impact for future mishap.
3. In Deepa v. S.I of Police[11] It was held that the enthusiasm of society ought to be given foremost thought over the individual enthusiasm of the individuals who are managing everything for benefit and who are likewise gaining vocation by playing out the men’s club move in a hotel[12]. It was where the entire public says that the move was indecent according to spectators, which is an offense u/s 294 of IPC 1860.

Henceforth it is discovered that Social Interest beats the Individual Interest. In any case, this isn’t correct by and large. Social Engineering manages the same number of fulfilments of human needs which implies law should assume a significant part in bringing social change by satisfying the enthusiasm of the general public overall.

There are additionally occurrences where individual intrigue has a need over social intrigue.

1. As indicated by Sec122 of Evidence Act 1872, conjugal correspondence among a couple which is an individual enthusiasm for homegrown connection are advantaged[13]. At that point, Social Interest can be satisfied by making sure about benefit correspondence (wedding correspondence) in which individual enthusiasm for association with homegrown connection is first special and which thus secures the social organization of relationships.
2. Law has offered inclination to the enthusiasm of in reverse classes through reservation in government occupations, instructive foundations, which hampers the enthusiasm of qualified applicant as well as it hampers the enthusiasm of the general population on the loose. By this kind of law general individuals can’t tell that this booking strategy which goes under-protected law is an awful law for them. In some cases, awful law turns out to be acceptable law. Here Law helps in social engineering by giving extraordinary security to the minority class having singular interests over social interests so that there can be extremely social advancement by bringing the minority class similarly to the norm of privileged.

Criticism of Theory

Notwithstanding Pound’s extraordinary commitment to sociological law and his accentuation on examining the real work of law in the public eye, his hypothesis experiences a few inadequacies. Pound’s hypothesis of social engineering has been scrutinized on different grounds.

It has been contended that the characterization of interests by the Pound is in the idea of an index, where increases and changes must be made persistently that are impartial comparable to the worth and need comparative with the unbiased worth. Pound’s hypothesis of social engineering has been scrutinized for its utilization of the term engineering, which compares society to a production line like a component.

Law is a social cycle instead of a consequence of applied engineering. It is additionally wrong to liken society to a plant in light of the fact that the previous is changing and dynamic in nature while the last is pretty much steady. Once more, Pound’s accentuation on engineering overlooks the way that law advances and creates in the public eye as per social needs and needs that for which law can create in the public arena as per social needs and for which either in law endorsement or dismissal may happen.

An overall analysis against Pound’s hypothesis is about his utilization of the word ‘engineering’ since it proposes a robotic use of the hypothesis to social needs, the expression “engineering” is utilized by Pound for the analogy to show the issues that law needs to confront, the goals to be met and the technique one must embrace for this reason.[14]

Conclusion

It is reasoned that law assumes a significant function in modifying irreconcilable situation. Both the public and private interests exist together. The two have equivalent needs. Roscoe Pound has given the possibility of Social Engineering for the American Society however this idea is followed generally for question goal. India additionally followed a similar idea in building up cultural government assistance. Both Judiciary and Legislators assume a significant part in authorizing the rules which satisfy the different wants of an individual. In this tech-savvy society wants of a person develops and to satisfy their wants new strategies, procedure has been created.

---

References:

[1] https://www.britannica.com/biography/Roscoe-Pound

[2] Ibid.

[3] Ibid.

[4] Dr. B N Mani Tripathi,Jurisprudence Legal Theory,16^th ed.,Allahabad Book Agency,pg.49,para 1

[5] SN Dhyani, Fundamentals of Jurisprudence, Third edition,Central Law Agency,pg.335

[6] M.D.A FREEMAN THOMSON,LLOYD‟S INTRODUCTION TO JURISPRUDENCE,8th ed 2008,Reuters legal Ltd.pg 903

[7] AIR 1996 5 SCC 650

[8] J.N.PANDEY,CONSTITUTIONAL LAW OF INDIA,42nd ed 2005,Central Law Agency Allahabad, pg 239

[9] AIR 1990 SC273:1989I SCC 674

[10] J.N.PANDEY,LAW OF TORTS,5th ed 2005,Central Law Publication,pg351

[11] 1986 Cri L.J.1120 Kerala

[12] S.N.MISHRA,IPC,16th ed 2008,Central Law Publication,pg393

[13] Sec122 of Evidence Act says that No person who is or has been married shall be compelled to disclose any communication made to him during marriage by any person to whom he is or has been married, nor shall he be permitted to disclose any such communication, unless the person made it, or his representative in interest , consents, except in suits between married persons, or proceedings in which one married person is prosecuted for any crime committed against the other

[14] R. Pound (1959) Jurisprudence, St Paul, Minnesota: West Publishing Company.