Facts: Badrinath vs Government of Tamil Nadu And others is rather a much convoluted and elaborated case in the Supreme Court of India pertaining to unfair treatment of the appellant, Mr. Badrinath, in matters regarding promotion at a government position. The facts of the case span over a period of Read more…
Facts: Dr. Sanjay Tungar working in the Cyber Crime Cell which comes under Commissioner office, Pune received an E-mail on the mail ID of the Pune Commissioner. The subject matter of the same was “In Ganesh festival bomb blast”. Further the mail contains the message as “Mission Ganesh attack. If Read more…
Facts: The defendant, a resident of Chennai, was riding his bicycle at 08:20 a.m., on 31st December 1991 and suddenly he was hit by a motorcycle. The consequences were that the defendant developed an injury on his leg. At 09:45 a.m. he was admitted to The Surya Hospital, of which Read more…
Facts: The appellant along with his three partners was the owner of a factory named Carbon Dry Colour Works. This factory was involved in the manufacture of paints and varnish. The factory was licensed by the Bombay Municipality in the year 1953 to manufacture paints involving a cold process and Read more…
Facts: The respondent was a nurse working at a government hospital in Goa. She has complained of having trouble with abdominal pain in 1993. The doctors in there advised her to consult with Dr. V.N. Shrikhande (appellant) residing in Dadar, Mumbai, having a hospital. After examining the pathologist’s report the Read more…
Introduction: Any Evolution? Yes, in the case of State of Tamil Nadu Vs. Suhas Katti, it was noticed for the first time that; “Section 65B certified evidence” was produced in a Court of law which made this case a historic case. Because the evidence that was presented in the case Read more…
Procedural History: Petitioners have appealed to the High court of Punjab and Haryana asking for the revision of the order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Patiala who allowed the application by the complainant under Section 319 Cr.P.C. for summoning the additional accused namely Mukul(petitioner 1), Sushank, Gurpartap(Petitioner 2) and Read more…
Facts: Obscene, vulgar, filthy, abusive, intimidating, embarrassing, humiliating, and defamatory e-mails were received by the plaintiff. Using the help of a private computer expert, plaintiff traced one of the e-mails received on 2nd April, 2001. Investigations revealed that the e-mail originated from a Cybercafe in New Delhi. During the enquiry, Read more…
Introduction: Looking at the present scenario, the rapid growth of Information Technology is closing all our lives within the four walls. These advancements brought a change in our office lifestyle and transformed all our works as the shift from bulky paper works to paperless PPT presentations. Now if we look Read more…
Also known as Sony Sambandh Case. Introduction: In the concerned case, the petitioner CBI has filed the case against the defendant Arif Azim, a call center employee, on the grounds of cybercrime committed by him. This case deals with the Information Technology Act, 2000 and India Penal Code, 1862. It Read more…
Introduction: After the end of world war, globalization was the next phase in human development. We could see small companies now becoming global conglomerates. In India, we saw the opening of our market for foreign companies in the 1990s. All this development brought us more comfort and variety in our Read more…
Introduction: The facts of the case involved in the constitution bench decision in P.V. Narashima Rao v. State are that in 1991 election Congress Party remained 14 members short of the majority and therefore it formed a minority government with P.V. Narashima Rao as the Prime Minister. As there was Read more…