Case Background: In this case, the bench was constituted to decide whether the case of Dr Vinod Narain v. State of U.P.[1] has been correctly decided by the Court or not. Issues Raised In the present case, the following issues were raised before the court – Whether the accused should Read more…
Brief Facts: The marriage between the parties took place on 27.9.1984. The husband filed for divorce from the defendant as PA No.431/90 in the Pune family court on the grounds of cruelty. The family court appealed the divorce decision in favor of the husband on 5.8.91. During the divorce decree, Read more…
Brief Facts: The appellant’s wife and the respondent’s husband decided to get married and gave birth to a baby girl named Karmistha Kaul. As time passed, they decided to get separated, and hence the appellant filed an application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. In the application, Read more…
Facts in Brief: Through specific appeals, the parties i.e., the couple have berated an order given on 26/10/2009, by the Hon’ble Additional Sessions Judge in his decision. Miss Priyanka Khanna had filed a petition before the Hon’ble Metropolitan Magistrate under Section 12 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005[1] and also filed an Read more…
Introduction: Matrimonial matters are between human beings based on an emotional relationship. It involves shared trust, respect, regard, love and friendship with adequate play for sensible adjustments with the companion. The relationship needs to adjust to the social norms too. the grounds for divorce in the Hindu Marriage Act 1955 Read more…
Introduction: This article illuminates the legal clash between the corporate goliaths Amazon and Reliance ventures over the acquisition of the Future Group in India. This clash between two of the world’s wealthiest men shows how high the stakes are for Mr Bezos and Mr Ambani in a market frequently depicted Read more…
Judgments obtained through fraudulent means are Non-Est in eyes of the law. Facts in Brief: The present case has a long history beginning in the early 1970s. The appellants were the owners of 18 acres of land in the village of Kancharapalem, Vishakapatnam. The Vishakapatnam Port Trust (VPT for short) intended Read more…
Facts of the Case: In the present case, the appellant-husband and respondent-wife both were doctors by profession. Husband filed a divorce petition against his wife on the grounds of cruelty under section 13(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The trial court found that the allegations made by the wife Read more…
Facts of the case: Kamla Devi (Respondent No. 1) was married, following the Hindu rituals, to Bhagwan Dutt, the appellant, on November 22, 1957. Respondent No. 2 was the daughter of Kamla Devi and Bhagwan Dutt, born on November 22, 1957. On October 18, 1966, Kamla Devi filed a petition Read more…
Introduction: Shreya Singhal vs UOI is a landmark judgment in which the Supreme Court of India questioned the constitutionality, and then struck down S. 66A of the “Information Technology Act, 2000” (henceforth referred to the IT Act, 2000). S. 66A of the IT Act, 2000 used to deal with the Read more…
Introduction: For years the women’s privileges have been forsaken by our patriarchal culture. The thinking of people that females are needed to be guarded and saved from the world has prompted the formation of various evil practices, traditions and rules. Recently, an essay written six years ago by Yogi Adityanath, Read more…
Introduction: This case[1] brings with it a tale of caution to the honorable judges of the court and the need for attention to detail, as shown by the Honourable Judge of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. The case pertains to a revision petition Read more…