Laws related to Movies and Films

Introduction

The Indian film industry has been divided and further sub-divided into different regional areas as the nation is culturally diverse and there are audiences from all the areas who want to be represented in the Big Screen. The Indian film industry is controlled by different creation houses, organisations who are liable for financing, casting, scripting of the said movies.

Indian and foreign producers require different sorts of consents and approvals from the Indian Government to shoot films in different parts of the nation dependent on the prerequisite of the content. An organised body like the Film Facilitation Office (FFO) has been set up by the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting in the National Film Development Corporation so as to promote and work with film shootings in India. It goes about as a single window help and clearance instrument that eases filming in India. Censorship might be applied to both composed and oral communications. Its range incorporates books, magazines, papers, radio, TV, films, shows, artistic creations, plays, addresses, dance, music, craftsmanship, writing, photos, messages, sites etc considered to be hostile, foul, disgusting and sexually explicit.

There are versatile laws and guidelines which are there in presence to have a legitimate system through which this industry can prosper in this country. Film and movies are an extremely powerful industry in a nation and it’s very important to know about the laws, guidelines, and legitimate properties in regard to this industry alongside its continuous modernisation alongside the changing occasions of our country.

Required Authorizations

1. Location related consents: Based on the location of the shooting authorisations from different specialists like city specialists, police, approved bodies are needed for shooting in public stops, public spots, landmarks etc. Shooting films in delicate spaces of any state require specific approvals.
   For example- The consent of the Ministry of Home Affairs is needed for shooting in Jammu and Kashmir or certain North Eastern parts of India. The thought behind such approvals is to guarantee that the concerned regions where shooting is be done isn’t displayed in a pessimistic light subsequently harming opinions of individuals. These authorisations can be handled by the Film Facilitation Office as a piece of the application given by the movie producers.
2. Filming with Governmental Authorities: If the film needs to shoot with a Government Department or use their assets like vehicles, outfits etc then unique licenses would likewise be needed from the respective Government Departments.
3. Filming Animals or Birds: If the content of the film requires recording with creatures or birds then the producer would require consent from Animal Welfare Board of India (AWBI). The AWBI might have bans or limitations to do shooting with or of specific sorts of creatures or birds.
4. Utilising drones to shoot: Using drones for photography or potentially recording innovation without authorisations might prompt infringement of protection laws. Utilisation of drones is controlled by the Civil Aviation Requirements given by Directorate General of Civil Aviation. India recently presented an approach for the importation and utilisation of drones. Movie producers need to guarantee that they are sticking to the administrative necessities of utilising drones in India for shooting purposes so they are not infringing upon any law or guideline which might be in power.
5. Immigration and importing: Foreign producers need to guarantee that they have appropriate visas for the personnel who will be working and shooting in India and significant customs duty would need to be paid for the import of any sort of gear that producers might need for shooting their movies in India. The FFO would be of incredible help for this interaction also.[1]

Offenses and Infringements to Stay Away From

1. Criticism: It is an offense under Section 499 of the Indian Penal Code 1860. The substance of this offense incorporates words expressed or composed which are of such nature that they can hurt the reputation of an individual and that such words don’t have any lawful legitimization or excuse. The words are disparaging in nature, all in all, it would imply that when these words are utilized they open someone else to certain undesirable and unappetizing feelings like hatred or ridicule.
2. Obscenity: Morality, obscenity and censorship are exactly classified under the Indian Penal Code 1860 as offenses under Section 292-294. Essentially according to the arrangements of these sections letting to hire, distribute, circulate, exhibit, import, export and commercialise of obscene are restricted demonstrations and are prohibited acts with fine and imprisonment. For example- The Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act 1986 denies the Indecent portrayal of women by making all goes about as offenses which depict women in a foul way. These demonstrations are prohibited with imprisonment and fine and they chiefly incorporate the composed and pictorial Section 67 of the Information Technology Act 2000 makes the transmission and distribution of vulgar and corrupt content in electronic structure a punishable offense. The Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act 1995 is the law for disallowing obscene content in programs being broadcasted by station on the TV.
3. Hate Speech: This has been delegated as an offense under the Indian Penal Code 1860 under Section 153 A punishes acts which advance enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race, spot of birth, home, language and doing acts which are biased to prejudicial maintenance. Section 295 A, punishes deliberate acts which intend to outrage religious feelings of any class by offending its religion or strict convictions. Section 505 (2) punishes offering expressions by any individual which makes or advances hostility or malevolence between various classes of individuals in the general public.
4. Sedition: It is an offense under Section 124 A of the Indian Penal Code 1860. It is very much like slander and disdain discourse yet anyway the prima facie distinction to note here is that sedition refers to incitement of hatred against the Government of India specifically, while the other two offenses talk about prompting of hatred among the overall population and individuals from the general public.
5. Against Competitive Agreement: It is a sort of agreement entered into between producers and cinemas. It is essentially a course of action went into by prudence of an arrangement wherein a producer pre books every one of the screens of a multiplex theatre or a single screen theatre accordingly incapacitating or decreasing the display of different movies so much they become industrially fruitless in spite of being acceptable movies such sort of understanding is restricted under the Competition Act 2002.[2]

Censorship

Films are compared with the Press as Press is additionally considered as an extraordinary medium of communication. Both the movies and the Press enjoy the similar status and right so far as constitutional freedom relating to expression of ideas and messages are concerned. As Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution ensures freedom of speech and expression which is stretched out to the Press moreover. Accordingly, both these mediums are controlled under this arrangement of the Constitution. At the same time these opportunities are not outright and are subject to established limitations, both these mediums are likewise to cling to this.

The Cinematograph Act, 1952 sees that movies satisfy the standards recommended by the law. The Act accommodates the foundation of a ‘Central Board of Film Certification’, the regulatory body for films in India to give the certificate to the producers of the film for public display. According to the arrangement of the law, the Board after inspecting the film or having it examined could:

1. Sanction the film for unrestricted public presentation
2. Sanction the film for public display limited to adults
3. Direct modifications and alterations in the movie prior to authorizing the movie to any unrestricted public show or for public display limited to adults
4. Refuse to sanction the film for public presentation.

K.A. Abbas vs Union of India [1971 AIR 481, 1971 SCR (2) 446] is maybe the main situation where the question relating to censorship of movies emerges. For this situation, the Supreme Court considered pre-censorship identifying of cinematograph films comparable to the fundamental right of freedom of speech and expression conferred by Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution. The candidate for this situation tested the choice of the Board of Film Censors in declining a ‘U’ certificate for his film “A Tale of Four Cities”. While the case was forthcoming in the Supreme Court, the Central Government conceded the ‘U’ certificate provided certain cuts in the film.

As the petitioner’s complaint was totally changed, the petitioner applied for an amendment empowering him to bring up the issue of pre-censorship in general, all together that people who put cash in making movies might have direction on this significant constitutional question. The amendment looked for by the appeal was took into account by the apex court. The accompanying two issues were bought under the watchful eye of the court for consideration:

1. That pre-censorship itself can’t go on without serious consequences under the ability of freedom of speech and expression
2. That regardless of whether it were a real restriction on the freedom, it should be practiced on exceptionally clear standards which rule out any arbitrary action.

Thinking about every one of these, Hidayatullah, Chief Justice clarified that censorship of movies including pre-censorship was naturally legitimate in India as it was a reasonable restriction within the ambit of Article 19 (2).

It was additionally seen that pre-censorship was nevertheless a part of censorship and bore a similar relationship in quality to the material as censorship after the motion picture has had a run. Nonetheless, censorship ought not be practiced as to cause preposterous limitations on the opportunity of freedom of expression. Holding the view that pre-censorship was just a part of censorship of cinematograph film was “universal”, Hidayatullah, proceeded to see that it had been generally perceived that movies should be dealt differently from other forms of art and expression. The court maintained the overall standards which had been set down for the direction of the censors.[3]

Film Industry and Intellectual Property

The freedom of speech and expression by a producer through their film might be limited with the goal that the film doesn’t represent a danger to public safety and harmony.

1. Entertainment Laws: Entertainment law incorporates media of various kinds like film, music, notice, web and news. Entertainment law covers with Intellectual property law.
2. Trademark: It is a kind of protected innovation which comprises of recognizable sign, plan or articulation of thought which makes one’s content unique.
3. Copyright: It is a kind of protected innovation that one can gain and turn into an owner of his/her creative work. It expects to keep away from duplication and for the insurance of the first articulation of thoughts.
4. Right to Publicity: They are the privileges of a person to control the business utilization of one’s character.
5. Right to Entertainment: It assists a person with having selected rights over her thoughts and considerations.[4]

Conclusion

Film being a significant instrument of expression of ideas and free thoughts should be unrestricted from any sort of censorship. Limitation of any sort should not infringe upon the fundamental rights of communicating one’s view. Simultaneously one should keep in mind the real factors of the general public where such thoughts are broadcasted. The harmony and security of the general public should not be disturbed during the process of expressing one’s thoughts. Films impact the general public everywhere, caution should be taken while showing the film to make sure that it is away from any sort of chaos and danger to national safety.

Consequently, an equilibrium should be kept up with between the right to expression and the obligation to keep up with harmony in the general public. The Certification Board should adopt a decent strategy while assessing a film and should consider the amicability between freedom of expression and sense of security and peace in the general public is kept up with.[5]

---

References:

[1] Ayush Verma, Film Making Laws in India, IPLEADERS BLOG (Sep. 13, 2021, 7:20 PM), https://blog.ipleaders.in/film-making-laws-india/.

[2] Ayush Verma, Film Making Laws in India, IPLEADERS BLOG (Sep. 13, 2021, 7:47 PM), https://blog.ipleaders.in/film-making-laws-india/.

[3] Sumit Mathew, Article 351 Censorship of Films, LEGAL SERVICE INDIA (Sep. 14, 2021, 8:01 PM)),https://www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-351-censorship-of-films.html.

[4] LAWYERS CLUB INDIA’S LAWS RELATING TO MAKING AND RELEASING OF MOVIES IN INDIA, https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/articles/laws-relating-to-making-and-releasing-of-movies-in-india-11823.asp (last visited Sep. 14, 2021).  

[5] Sumit Mathew, Article 351 Censorship of Films, LEGAL SERVICE INDIA (Sep. 14, 2021, 8:28 PM)),https://www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-351-censorship-of-films.html.