Limitations on Advocate about Advertising their Practice: A comparative analysis of India, UK and USA

Introduction

Advertisement is one of the intrinsic features of carrying out any business, profession, or company nowadays. It offers a platform for the services providers or manufacturers to present any form of information to a massive amount of the general public at a time, for the reason that such commercial formulates on the rules and guidelines laid down on such behalf. This conversation may be through newspapers, magazines, emails, letters, events, etc.

Advertisements or Commercial Speeches had been included under Article 19 (1)(a) of the Constitution of India. It has been honoured as part of Freedom of Speech and Expression[1]. The Supreme Court has taken this into consideration in the case of Tata Press Limited vs Mahanagar Telephone-Nigam, 3^rd August 1995[2] that the general public at huge has a right to get hold of the commercial information and such protection under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India should be available for both the parties of the speech. The commercial nature of such expressions was held to be immaterial while extending the protection below the stated article of the Constitution.

Rule 36 of the Bar Council of India

Rule number 36 of the Bar Council of India (BCI) states that Indian Law companies or firms, lawyers aren’t allowed to market their activity of practicing within the market, both offline or online. In simple words, this rule states that an advocate in India cannot solicit his or her work or market it, both directly or in a roundabout way through circulars, advertisements, personal communications or interviews, or through furnishing or inspiring newspaper comments or posting photographs in reference to their cases.

The signboard or name-plate of an advocate ought to be of a reasonable length and must not imply that he or she has been the President or Member of a Bar Council[3] or of any Association or that he has been related to any individual or organization or that he has been a Judge or an Advocate General.

However, the Bar Council of India (BCI) has not absolutely disregarded the developments within the liberalized current generation. The BCI lately determined to amend Rule 36 with the aid of including a clause that permits advocates to keep websites within which they can describe themselves or their law firms to provide information about his or her work or enterprise and assist people to provide better information.

Any facts apart from the information which are permitted by the Bar Council of India might be taken into consideration as a contravention of Rule 36 and this act of the advocate might be answerable and denoted as a misconduct under Section 35 of the Advocates Act, 1961[4].

Justice Krishna Iyer once cited that “law isn’t always a trade, not always briefs, not a merchandise, and so the heaven of commercial competition must not vulgarize the legal profession”[5].

However, over the years, courts have followed the view that ‘legal offerings’ shape an element of ‘offerings’ rendered to clients. Lawyers are expected as provider vendors. They are responsible to their clients in the case of a deficiency of offerings.

In 2008, the whole ban on the marketing of legal professionals was uplifted and no restrictions were imposed to a positive extent. The amendment allowed advocates to address their names, phone numbers, e-mail IDs, and academic qualifications at the websites as per their preference.

The rising legal service sector is similarly useful to all clients of legal offerings, without any discrimination. In the age of consumerism and competition in the legal world, clients’ right to free and honest competition[6] is paramount and cannot be denied by every other consideration. Trade-in legal offerings provide attention to benefits accruing to clients from the legal provider sector, especially the quality of service to be had with recognize to precise fields.

A Comparative Analysis

Advertising policies for advocates are absolutely unique in different nations. The marketplace for advertising and marketing by legal professionals within the USA is well-developed, wherein legal professionals are free to promote it and showcase their forte.

India

In the above discussion, we already witnessed the position of Indian lawyers in terms of marketing. Presently, numerous systems of legal tech are sprouting within legal areas which let in advocates to showcase their qualifications, expertise, experience, etc., so that it will offer the client with alternatives to select from. The legal career has depended on word-of-mouth for years now. A time has come when the Indian legal industry ought to include the change and indulge within the advertising in their brand. Nonetheless, the Legislature desires to draft certain recommendations for marketing the legal exercise to hold a check on malpractice.

United States of America

As noted previously, the laws on advertising in the United States were much like India until 1977. However, the ordinance 27 of the Professional Ethics of American Bar Association[7] cited that it was unprofessional to solicit expert employment through advertisements. However, it has now turn out to be a constitutionally protected right following the selection of the United States Supreme Court in Bates v. State Bar of Arizona. Advertising with the aid of using legal experts in the USA is presently ruled through the Model Rules of Professional Conduct, 1983.

According to the Rules, a legal professional may also promote his offerings via written, recorded, or digital conversation, which includes public media, concern to the subsequent conditions:

• No fake or deceptive conversation ought to be made approximately by the legal professional or the legal professional’s offerings.
• No legal professional shall solicit expert employment in person, stay cell phone or digital settlement when a big purpose is the legal professional’s pecuniary gain.

United Kingdom

The U.K. had prohibited the commercialization of legal offerings, attributable to the old Victorian notions. However, the Monopolies and Mergers Commission in 1970[8] and the Office of Fair Trading in 1986, got here up with critiques that highlighted the advantages of permitting commercial of legal offerings. This modified the scenario in UK the wrong way up and the age-old Victorian notions had been completed away with. The marketing of the legal offerings in the U.K. is ruled by the regulation contained under the Solicitor’s Publicity Code, 1990, which has been periodically updated.

Under the rule, the advertisement of the legal offerings ought to not be misleading, however ought to offer enough information in an effort to permit the customers to make a knowledgeable choice, thereby, addressing the right to information factor of the clients. The Code similarly offers that, the marketing can also additionally incorporate the costs of the lawyer, supplied that the costs aren’t always pitched at a dangerously low level and that it ought to be observed with the aid of assertion that extra costs are probably applicable, upon the costs.

Conclusion

Lawyers have some responsibilities; some are owed to the court and the others are owed to the public. Those responsibilities additionally embody a few rights inside it. And as long as those rights do not intervene with both sets of responsibilities, the lawyers are completely equipped to work out such rights. An affordable scope of advertisement can coexist which does not have an effect on the respect of the Profession.

In the case of V.B. Joshi v. Union of India, numerous different critical troubles including publishing brochures for distribution at seminars and having insertions in online regulation dictionaries, have been not mentioned through the court, and the modification only constrained itself to online advertisements. The amendment vividly did not remember the illiteracy fee of India, or they pick to disregard it. Not anybody in India has to get access to the internet or maybe in the event that they do, they lack capabilities to make use of it at the specified level.

Countries just like the U.K. and the U.S. have lifted the restrictions that were imposed on the advocates regarding legal marketing to make sure that there may be a specific general finding out the scale and style of the commercial. Although, it’s far a volatile operation wherein the bad effect can also additionally overshadow the high-quality factors of classified ads and additionally does not provide any assurance that simply due to the fact it is successful in different international locations can be specifically a success in India. But considering that when the government has stopped itself from imposing new legal guidelines that have greater severe outcomes, due to the elements together with chance and possibilities of not be a success.

Despite the above argument, any reasonable individual can foresee that the bad elements which are connected to the concept can effortlessly be curtailed through effectively following hard and fast rules. A panel will be fashioned to administrate over regarding matters, as an example the exploitation of the Idea or the shifting of focus

Therefore, the BCI needs to include the change that to place a close check over the advertisement within the legal sector to protect the favoured conventional perception and appeal to penal provisions to punish the violators.

---

References:

[1] Subhodh Asthana, Freedom of speech and expression, ipleaders (5^th sept, 2021, 7:00 AM) https://blog.ipleaders.in/freedom-speech-expression/

[2] IndianKanoon, Tata Press Limited vs Mahanagar Telephone-Nigam, IndianKanoon (4^th sept, 2021, 10:00 AM) https://indiankanoon.org/doc/752455/

[3] The Bar Council of India, Rules on Professional Standards, The Bar Council of India (6^th sept, 2021, 7:00 PM) http://www.barcouncilofindia.org/about/professional-standards/rules-on-professional-standards/

[4] IndianKanoon, Rule 35 in The Advocate Act, 1961, IndianKanoon (6^th sept, 2021, 8:00PM) https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1460739/

[5]Law Teacher, Advertising done by the attorney for the service they provide, Law Teacher (5^th sept, 2021, 5:00) shorturl.at/nrzE7

[6] Adv. Swapnil Joshi, Changing face of the Legal professional in India in the era of globalisation, Legal service India (6^th sept, 2021, 12:00PM) https://www.legalserviceindia.com/articles/lprof.htm

[7] Nitesh Mishra, Advertisement of Legal Services in India, LawTimesJournal (6^th sept, 2021, 5:00 PM) https://lawtimesjournal.in/advertisement-of-legal-service-in-india/

[8]Ijlpp.com, Restrictions on Advertisement in the Legal Profession in India: The Anti-Competitive Aspect, Ijlpp.com (6^th sept, 2021, 8:00 PM) https://ijlpp.com/restrictions-on-advertisement-in-the-legal-profession-in-india-the-anti-competitive-aspect/